Nadhif, Muhammad Fikri (2023) Perencanaan Tebal Perkerasan Lentur Landas Pacu Bandara Internasional Dhoho Menggunakan Metode Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) dan Load Classification Number (LCN). Other thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
Text
10111910010015-Undergraduate_Thesis.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 September 2025. Download (19MB) |
Abstract
Menurut Perpres 56 tahun 2018 tentang perubahan kedua atas perubahan Perpres No 3 tahun 2016 tentang Percepatan Proyek Strategis Nasional, Bandara Internasional Dhoho telah ditetapkan menjadi sebuah proyek strategis nasional. Pada sebuah bandara, landasan pacu memiliki peran penting sebagai salah satu fasilitas utama penunjang operasional bandara sehingga perencanaannya perlu perhatian lenih salah satunya pada aspek tebal perkerasan landasan pacu. Banyak metode dalam merencanakan perkerasan lentur landasan pacu, seperti Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) dari Dinas Perhubungan Udara Amerika Serikat, metode Load Classification Number (LCN) dari Inggris dan lain sebagainya. Pada tugas akhir ini bertujuan merencanakan tebal perkerasan lentur landasan pacu menggunakan metode Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) dan Load Classification Number (LCN). Kedua metode dipilih karena terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan dalam aspek perencanaannya. Dari tebal perkerasan yang diperoleh kemudian dianalisis besar kapasitas perkerasan dan dibandingkan dengan kebutuhan perkerasan pesawat rencana. Dilakukan pula analisis metode pelaksanaan dan biaya konstruksi untuk membandingkan aspek ekonomis kedua metode. Hasil analisis tebal perkerasan lentur pada metode FAA menggunakan FAA AC 5320-6D diperoleh hasil sebesar 508 mm pada daerah kritis, 439 mm pada daerah non kritis dan setebal 360 mm pada bahu landasan pacu. Menggunakan program COMFAA diperoleh nilai PCN sebesar 42,9 denagn nilai AC sebesar 40,2. Pada metode FAA menggunakan program FAARFIELD diperoleh hasil sebesar 519 mm dan pada bahu landasan pacu sebesar 356 mm. Menggunakan program bantu FAARFIELD diperoleh nilai PCR sebesar 386,4 dan nilai ACR sebesar 365,1. Sedangkan pada metode LCN diperoleh total tebal perkerasan sebesar 550 mm dan pada bahu landasan pacu setebal 450 mm. Diperoleh nilai LCN landasan pacu yakni sebesar 63 dan nilai LCN pesawat rencana sebesar 46,5. Hasil analisis biaya konstruksi untuk tebal perkerasan pada metode FAA menggunakan FAA AC 5320-6D diperoleh sebesar Rp187.607.898.600, pada FAA AC 5320-6G sebesar Rp212.826.956.294. Sementara pada metode LCN diperoleh sebesar Rp225.887.763.123. Selain dari ketiga aspek tersebut, metode FAA lebih diunggulkan karena terdapat pembaharuan aturan yang komprehensif dibandingkan metode LCN. Sehingga, dapat disimpulkan bahwa metode FAA lebih relevan digunakan dalam merencanakan tebal perkerasan lentur sebuah landasan pacu.
==================================================================================================================================
According to Presidential Regulation (Perpres) No. 56 of 2018 concerning the second amendment to Presidential Regulation No. 3 of 2016 concerning the Acceleration of National Strategic Projects, Dhoho International Airport has been designated as a national strategic project. In an airport, the runway plays a crucial role as one of the main supporting facilities for airport operations, and its planning requires careful attention, particularly in terms of the runway pavement thickness. There are various methods for planning the flexible pavement thickness of the runway, such as the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) method from the United States Department of Transportation, and the Load Classification Number (LCN) method from the United Kingdom, among others. The aim of this final project is to plan the flexible pavement thickness of the runway using both the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) method and the Load Classification Number (LCN) method. These two methods were chosen because they differ significantly in their planning aspects. After obtaining the pavement thickness, the pavement capacity will be analyzed and compared with the planned aircraft pavement requirements. Additionally, an analysis of construction methods and costs will be conducted to compare the economic aspects of both methods. The analysis results for the flexible pavement thickness using the FAA method, based on FAA AC 5320-6D, are 508 mm in critical areas, 439 mm in non-critical areas, and 360 mm on the runway shoulders. Using the COMFAA program, the PCN (Pavement Classification Number) is determined to be 42.9 with an AC (Aircraft Classification Number) of 40.2. With the FAARFIELD program, the FAA method yields thickness results of 519 mm for the runway and 356 mm for the shoulders. The supplementary FAARFIELD program provides PCR (Pavement Classification Rating) and ACR (Aircraft Classification Rating) values of 386.4 and 365.1, respectively. On the other hand, the LCN method yields a total pavement thickness of 550 mm and 450 mm on the runway shoulders. The LCN values for the runway and the planned aircraft are 63 and 46.5, respectively. The analysis of construction costs for the pavement thickness, using the FAA method based on FAA AC 5320-6D, amounts to Rp187,607,898,600, while using FAA AC 5320-6G results in Rp212,826,956,294. Meanwhile, for the LCN method, the construction cost is Rp225,887,763,123. Besides these three aspects, the FAA method is favored due to its comprehensive updated regulations compared to the LCN method. Therefore, it can be concluded that the FAA method is more relevant for planning the flexible pavement thickness of a runway
Item Type: | Thesis (Other) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | FAA, Landasan Pacu, LCN, Perkerasan Lentur; FAA, Flexible Pavement, LCN, Runway |
Subjects: | T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Vocational > Civil Infrastructure Engineering (D4) |
Depositing User: | MUHAMMAD FIKRI NADHIF |
Date Deposited: | 31 Aug 2023 07:53 |
Last Modified: | 31 Aug 2023 07:53 |
URI: | http://repository.its.ac.id/id/eprint/101424 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |