In-between Memory: Perancangan Learning Hub Sebagai Wahana Euforia Remembering Dan Forgetting Di Kawasan Heritage Surabaya

Nada, Nabilah Qothrun (2026) In-between Memory: Perancangan Learning Hub Sebagai Wahana Euforia Remembering Dan Forgetting Di Kawasan Heritage Surabaya. Masters thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

Text 6013241011-Master_Thesis.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (19MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Melalui neuroarsitektur, arsitektur diposisikan sebagai bagian dari lingkungan binaan yang dapat memengaruhi sistem kognitif manusia, salah satunya memori. Dalam sistem kognitif tersebut, memori bekerja melalui dinamika remembering (mengingat) dan forgetting (melupakan) yang membentuk pengalaman manusia. Interaksi keduanya menghadirkan kondisi in-between memory, yaitu ruang transisi ketika ingatan tidak sepenuhnya hadir maupun hilang, tetapi muncul. Hal ini menjadi gagasan utama perancangan fasilitas Learning hub bagi generasi produktif berlokasi di Kawasan Heritage Tunjungan Surabaya. Proses perancangan menggunakan kerangka kerja perancangan menerapkan berpikir deduktif dengan melakukan kajian teori, kajian preseden dan riset arsitektur untuk menelusuri hubungan antara arsitektur dan mekanisme memori. Untuk menggali hubungan tersebut, tesis perancangan ini menerapkan metode pengumpulan data kualitatif data seperti observasi naturalistik, kajian preseden, penyebaran kuesioner tidak terstruktur, & wawancara mendalam. Data dianalisis secara triangulasi melalui koding data & divisualisasikan dengan desain skematik. Gagasan in-between menjadi orientasi utama untuk dipetakan melalui first principle thinking menjadi kriteria perancangan. Kemudian, kriteria tersebut ditransfer menjadi aspek formal menggunakan generative processes menggunakan komunikasi diagram arsitektur. Hasil riset merumuskan 5 aspek mekanisme memori yang diterapkan pada elemen arsitektur menunjukkan pengaruh signifikan dari atensi (kontras visual interaktif dan taktil), asosiasi (bentuk ruang yang memicu memori personal), kolektivitas (penanda), repetisi (pengulangan warna/pencahayaan yang memicu nostalgia), serta interferensi (kontras terarah untuk mengurangi kelebihan beban informasi). Memori kolektif ditonjolkan terutama melalui desain formal, sedangkan memori individual ditonjolkan terutama melalui desain spasial. Keseluruhan rancangan berlandaskan pada argumen desain bahwa arsitektur adalah wahana euforia in-between memory, tempat mengingat dan melupakan melebur menjadi satu di konteks Kawasan Heritage Tujungan Surabaya.
====================================================================================================================================
Through neuroarchitecture, architecture is positioned as part of the built environment capable of influencing the human cognitive system, memory being one of its key components. Within this cognitive system, memory operates through the dynamics of remembering and forgetting, which together shape human experience. The interaction between the two gives rise to a condition of in-between memory a transitional space in which memory is neither fully present nor fully absent, but emergent. This idea forms the central design concept for a Learning hub facility for the productive-age generation, located in the Tunjungan Heritage Area, Surabaya. The design process employs a design framework grounded in deductive reasoning, drawing on theoretical review, precedent study, and architectural research to trace the relationship between architecture and memory mechanisms. To explore this relationship, this design thesis applies qualitative data collection methods, including naturalistic observation, precedent study, unstructured questionnaires, and in-depth interviews. Data were analyzed through triangulation via data coding and visualized through schematic design. The concept of in-betweenness serves as the primary orientation, mapped through first-principle thinking into design criteria. These criteria are then translated into formal aspects through generative processes using architectural diagram communication. The research findings formulate five memory mechanism aspects applied to architectural elements, showing significant influence from attention (interactive visual contrast and haptic experience), association (spatial forms triggering personal memory), collectivity (identity markers), repetition (recurring color and lighting patterns evoking nostalgia), and interference (directed contrast to reduce information overload). Collective memory is primarily emphasized through formal design, while individual memory is primarily emphasized through spatial design. The overall design is grounded in the argument that architecture serves as a vehicle for the euphoria of in-between memory a space where remembering and forgetting merge into one within the context of the Tunjungan Heritage Area, Surabaya.

Item Type:	Thesis (Masters)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	In-between memory, Neuroarsitektur, Learning hub, Heritage, In-between memory, Neuroarchitecture, Learning hub, Heritage
Subjects:	N Fine Arts > NA Architecture N Fine Arts > NA Architecture > NA2750 Architectural design.
Divisions:	Faculty of Civil, Planning, and Geo Engineering (CIVPLAN) > Architecture > 23101-(S2) Master Thesis
Depositing User:	Nabilah Qothrun Nada
Date Deposited:	04 Aug 2026 08:20
Last Modified:	04 Aug 2026 08:20
URI:	http://repository.its.ac.id/id/eprint/143199

Actions (login required)

View Item