Evaluasi Perbandingan Kecepatan Pembangunan Kapal Cepat Rudal 60 Meter Dengan Sistem 4 Starting Point dan Sistem 1 Starting Point

Sukma, Cantata Aga (2018) Evaluasi Perbandingan Kecepatan Pembangunan Kapal Cepat Rudal 60 Meter Dengan Sistem 4 Starting Point dan Sistem 1 Starting Point. Undergraduate thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

[img] Text
4313100140-Undergraduate_Theses.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (4MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Dalam proses percepatan pembangunan Kapal Cepat Rudal 60 Meter (KCR-60M) ke-4 atau KCR-60M Batch 2, digunakan metode 4 starting point dengan 4 modul (zone Engine Room, zone Cargo Hold, zone accommodation Bridge dan zone Wheel House), yang dikerjakan secara paralel. Dan selanjutnya dievaluasi berapa % percepatan yang terjadi bandingkan dengan durasi penyelesaian pembangunan KCR-60M dengan 1 starting point,. Sebelum proses fisik pembangunan KCR-60M ke-4 dilaksanakan, schedule detail dengan telah mempertimbangkan segala aspek telah dibuat, namun dalam pelaksanaannya masih juga dijumpai kendala yang menghambat proses penyelesaian proyek. Untuk itu pada periode tertentu perlu dilakukan evaluasi kinerja proyek guna kepastian proyek dapat diselesaikan tepat waktu sesuai rencana, dan evaluasi dapat dilakukan menggunakan Earned Value Analysis (EVA). Berdasarkan biaya, evaluasi kinerja proyek perbulan selama 6 bulan didapatkan hasil : Schedule Variance (SV) pada peninjauan ke-1 s/d ke-4 bernilai negatif (lebih lambat dari rencana), peninjauan ke-5 dan ke 6 nilai positif (lebih cepat dari rencana), Schedule Performance Index (SPI)) pada peninjauan ke-1 s/d ke-4 bernilai < 1 (lebih lambat dari rencana), peninjauan ke-5 dan ke-6 >1 (lebih cepat dari rencana). Jika kinerja proyek tetap, diprediksi penyelesaian pekerjaan = 400 hari, berdasarkan perencanaan = 405 hari, maka terjadi percepatan = 5 hari . Penyelesaian pekerjaan Hull Construction KCR-60M ke-4 = 400 hari, Penyelesaian pekerjaan KCR-60M sebelumnya dengan 1 starting point = 468 hari, terjadi percepatan = 68 hari atau 14,5 % Berdasarkan waktu, Schedule Variance (SV(t)) pada peninjauan ke-1 s/d ke-4 bernilai negatif (lebih lambat dari rencana), peninjauan ke-5 dan ke 6 nilai positif (lebih cepat dari rencana). Schedule Performance Index (SPI(t)) pada peninjauan ke-1 s/d ke-4 bernilai < 1 (lebih lambat dari rencana), peninjauan ke-5 dan ke 6 nilai >1 (lebih cepat dari rencana). Jika kinerja proyek tetap, diprediksi penyelesaian pekerjaan = 401 hari, berdasarkan perencanaan = 405 hari, maka terjadi percepatan = 4 hari. Penyelesaian pekerjaan Hull Construction KCR-60M ke-4 = 401 hari, Penyelesaian pekerjaan KCR-60M sebelumnya dengan 1 starting point = 468 hari, maka terjadi percepatan = 67 hari atau 14,3 % ================ In the process of accelerating the construction of the 60 Meter Rapid Missile Ship (KCR-60M) or KCR-60M Batch 2, 4 methods of 4 starting point with 4 modules (zone Engine Room, Cargo Hold zone, zone accommodation zone and Wheel House) which is done in parallel. And then evaluated how much% acceleration that occurs compare with the duration of completion of construction KCR-60M with 1 starting point, Before the physical process of KCR-60M 4th development was carried out, detailed schedule taking into account all aspects was made, but in the implementation there were also obstacles that hampered the project completion process. For that period, it is necessary to evaluate project performance to ensure the project can be completed on time according to plan, and evaluation can be done using Earned Value Analysis (EVA). Based on cost, monthly project performance evaluation for 6 months resulted: Schedule Variance (SV) at review 1st to 4th is negative (slower than plan), 5th and 6th review of positive value (faster of the plan), the Schedule Performance Index (SPI) at the 1st to 4th visit is <1 (slower than plan), the 5th and 6th> 1st (faster than plan). If project performance is fixed, predicted completion of work = 400 days, based on planning = 405 days, then acceleration = 5 days. Completion of 4th KCR-60M Hull Construction work = 400 days, Completion of previous KCR-60M work with 1 starting point = 468 days, acceleration = 68 days or 14.5% Time based, Schedule Variance (SV (t)) on the 1st to 4th visit is negative (slower than plan), 5th and 6th positive values (faster than plan). The Schedule Performance Index (SPI (t)) at review 1st to 4th is <1 (slower than plan), 5th and 6th values> 1 (ahead of plan). If the project performance remains, predictable completion of work = 401 days, based on planning = 405 days, then acceleration = 4 days. Completion of 4th KCR-60M Hull Construction work = 401 days, Completion of previous KCR-60M work with 1 starting point = 468 days, acceleration = 67 days or 14.3%

Item Type: Thesis (Undergraduate)
Uncontrolled Keywords: starting point; modul; kinerja proyek; earned value analysis; Schedule Variance; Schedule Performance Index; module; project performance; earned value analysis; Schedule Variance; Schedule Performance Index
Subjects: T Technology > T Technology (General) > T56.8 Project Management
V Naval Science > VM Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering
Divisions: Faculty of Marine Technology > Ocean Engineering > (S1) Undergraduate Theses
Depositing User: Cantata Aga S
Date Deposited: 09 Apr 2018 05:01
Last Modified: 09 Apr 2018 05:01
URI: http://repository.its.ac.id/id/eprint/50663

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item