Prayogo, Michael Antonie (2021) Perbandingan antara Hasil Analisa Kapasitas Dukung Pondasi Tiang Berdasarkan Metode Empiris dan Metode Elemen Hingga Dengan Hasil Uji Analisa Dinamis di Lapangan. Masters thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November.
![[thumbnail of 03111950010003 - Master_Thesis.pdf]](http://repository.its.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
03111950010003 - Master_Thesis.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (2MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Banyak metode untuk menghitung kapasitas dukung pondasi tiang. Masalah yang sedang terjadi adalah mencari metode yang paling representatif terhadap hasil pengujian beban dinamis (PDA) di lapangan. Dalam penelitian ini hanya mencakup di daerah Surabaya Barat dan Surabaya Utara. Metode yang digunakan untuk menganalisa kapasitas dukung pondasi tiang dalam penelitian ini adalah metode empiris yaitu metode Schmertmann, Meyerhof dan metode L. Decourt serta metode elemen hingga (FEM) untuk perhitungan kapasitas dukung pada pondasi tiang pracetak. Tahap awal penelitian adalah mengumpulkan data-data penyelidikan tanah berupa boring log N-SPT dan hasil-hasil pengujian PDA di daerah tersebut. Kemudian dilakukan analisa perhitungan dengan metode empiris dan FEM yang nanti hasilnya akan dibandingkan dengan hasil PDA. Analisa pada FEM menggunakan dynamic load *dengan permodelan pile driving yang pelaksanaannya mirip dengan pengujian PDA. Setelah dibandingkan, telah diketahui ratio antara masing-masing metode perhitungan dengan hasil PDA di lapangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa metode yang paling representatif terhadap hasil PDA di Surabaya Barat adalah metode Meyerhof. Untuk daerah Surabaya Utara metode-metode tersebut belum menunjukan hasil yang representatif terhadap hasil PDA di lapangan.
=========================================================
There are many methods for calculating the bearing capacity of a pile foundation. The problem that is happening is finding the most representative method of dynamic load testing (PDA) results in the field. In this study only covers the areas of West Surabaya and North Surabaya. The method used to analyze the bearing capacity of the pile foundation in this study is the empirical method, namely the Schmertmann, Meyerhof and L. Decourt method and the finite element method (FEM) for calculating the bearing capacity of precast pile foundations. The initial stage of the research was to collect soil survey data in the form of N-SPT boring logs and PDA test results in the area. Then the calculation analysis is carried out using the empirical method and FEM, which will be compared with the results of the PDA. FEM analysis uses dynamic load with pile driving modeling which is similar to PDA testing. After comparison, it is known the ratio between each calculation method and the results of PDAs in the field. The results of this study indicate that the most representative method for PDA results in West Surabaya is the Meyerhof method. For the North Surabaya area these methods have not shown representative results of PDA results in the field
| Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Pile Dynamic Analysis, Dynamic Load Test, Kapasitas Dukung Pondasi, Surabaya Barat, Surabaya Utara Pile Dynamic Analysis, Dynamic Load Test, Foundation Support Capacity, West Surabaya, North Surabaya |
| Subjects: | T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) > TA455.S6 Soil (Materials of engineering and construction) |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Civil, Planning, and Geo Engineering (CIVPLAN) > Civil Engineering > 22101-(S2) Master Thesis |
| Depositing User: | Michael Antonie Prayogo |
| Date Deposited: | 06 Mar 2021 05:49 |
| Last Modified: | 06 Mar 2021 05:49 |
| URI: | http://repository.its.ac.id/id/eprint/83658 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |