Ardhinata, Tangguh (2024) Analisis Perbandingan Waktu Dan Biaya Berdasarkan Quantity Take-Off Menggunakan BIM Revit dan Metode Konvensional [Studi Kasus : Overpass Pada Proyek Tol Indralaya Prabumulih STA 14+934]. Other thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
![[thumbnail of 2035201092_Undergraduate Thesis.pdf]](http://repository.its.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
2035201092_Undergraduate Thesis.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 October 2026. Download (20MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga menerapkan Building Information Modelling (BIM) dalam pembangunan jalan tol untuk meningkatkan daya produksi dan efisiensi. Teknologi ini mempermudah perencanaan proyek, perhitungan kuantitas, perbandingan volume, pengadaan alat, jadwal konstruksi, dan estimasi biaya. Referensi dalam pengerjaan penelitian ini menggunakan Ir. A Soedrajat S, Analisa (cara modern), Permen PUPR 28 Tahun 2016, (Permen PUPR 8, 2023),Permen PUPR 1 Tahun 2022 Buku Referensi untuk Kontraktor (PP), (Rochmanhadi) Departemen PU serta referensi penelitian terdahulu. Perhitungan pada penelitian ini dilakukan dengan dua metode perhitungan yaitu metode konvensional dan metode QTO Autodesk Revit, lalu dilanjutkan perhitungan produktivitas, dan perhitungan waktu dengan output MS Project ke Autodesk Navisworks 2023 untuk BIM 4D, Berikutnya dilakukan perhitungan rencana anggaran pelaksanaan (RAP). Terakhir membuat time schedule untuk waktu perencanaan konstruksi. Dari kedua ini, akan dilakukan manakah perbandingan kedua metode yang lebih efektif serta efisien. Maka dari itu hasil yang di dapatkan dengan metode konvensional pada penelitian ini yaitu volume beton 864 m3 sedangkan dengan metode perhitungan Autodesk Revit didapatkan sebesar 859 m3,maka selisih dari kedua metode di dapatkan selisih sebesar 1,29%. Untuk volume besi dengan perhitungan konvensional di dapatkan 139194 kg, sedangkan dengan metode perhitungan Autodesk Revit didapatkan sebesar 131890, maka selisih kedua metode tersebut yaitu sebesar 5,35%. Metode konvensional di dapatkan estimasi biaya sebesar Rp 6,374,609,045 sedangkan dengan menggunakan perhitungan Autodesk Revit menghasilkan estimasi biaya sebesar Rp6,356,581,019. Dalam perhitungan durasi pelaksanaan baik metode konvensional dan metode BIM Autodesk Revit di dapatkan persamaan durasi pelaksanaan yaitu 130 hari. Dari perhitungan kedua metode tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara metode konvensional dengan BIM Revit,dikarenakan pemodelan dengan BIM Revit dilakukan dengan mengekspor langsung dari AutoCAD ke Revit, menghasilkan perbedaan kecil dibandingkan perhitungan konvensional. Kelebihan Autodesk Revit meliputi pendekatan berbasis objek yang mendekati realitas, integrasi informasi untuk pengambilan keputusan yang lebih baik, dan revisi otomatis yang mengurangi waktu revisi dan pembaruan. Selain itu, Revit memiliki fitur render untuk visualisasi yang lebih baik.
====================================================================================================================================
The Directorate General of Highways applies Building Information Modeling (BIM) in toll road construction to increase production capacity and efficiency. This technology facilitates project planning, quantity calculations, volume calculations, equipment procurement, construction schedules, and cost estimates. References in this research work use Ir. A Soedrajat S, Analysis (modern way), PUPR Ministerial Regulation 28 of 2016, (PUPR Ministerial Regulation 8, 2023), PUPR Ministerial Regulation 1 of 2022 Reference Book for Contractors (PP), (Rochmanhadi) PU Department and previous research references. The calculations in this study were carried out using two calculation methods, namely the conventional method and the Autodesk Revit QTO method, then continued with productivity calculations, and time calculations with MS Project output to Autodesk Navisworks 2023 for BIM 4D, then the implementation budget plan (RAP) was calculated. Finally, make a time schedule for the construction planning time. From these two, a comparison will be made between the two methods that are more effective and efficient. Therefore, the results obtained with the conventional method in this study were a concrete volume of 864 m3 while the Autodesk Revit calculation method obtained 859 m3, so the difference between the two methods was 1.29%. For the volume of iron with conventional calculations obtained 139194 kg, while the Autodesk Revit calculation method obtained 131890, so the difference between the two methods was 5.35%. The method obtained an estimated cost of Rp 6,374,609,045 while using the Autodesk Revit calculation, the estimated cost was Rp 6,356,581,019. In calculating the duration of implementation, both the conventional method and the Autodesk Revit BIM method obtained the same duration of implementation, namely 130 days. From the calculation of the two methods, there is no significant difference between the conventional method and BIM Revit, because modeling with BIM Revit is done by exporting directly from AutoCAD to Revit, resulting in a small difference compared to conventional calculations. Autodesk Revit's advantages include an object-based approach that is close to reality, information integration for better decision-making, and automatic revisions that reduce revision and update time. In addition, Revit has a rendering feature for better visualization.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Other) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Building Information Modelling, Konstruksi, Revit, Building Information Modelling, Construction, Revit |
| Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) T Technology > TE Highway engineering. Roads and pavements T Technology > TH Building construction > TH438.13 Building information modeling. |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Vocational > Civil Infrastructure Engineering (D4) |
| Depositing User: | Tangguh Ardhinata |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Aug 2024 03:42 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Aug 2024 02:07 |
| URI: | http://repository.its.ac.id/id/eprint/112759 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |