Hagins, Clairine Sola Gratia (2025) Implementasi Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) dan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) untuk Analisis Dampak Gas Rumah Kaca dan Pengendaliannya pada Proses Produksi Minyak Mentah. Masters thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
![[thumbnail of 6014231003-Master_Thesis.pdf]](http://repository.its.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png) |
Text
6014231003-Master_Thesis.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (7MB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
Perusahaan X merupakan salah satu Perusahaan yang bergerak di industri minyak dan gas yang dituntut berkontribusi terhadap target NDC (Nationally Determined Contribution) Indonesia untuk mengurangi emisi gas rumah kaca. Tuntutan ini juga selaras dengan pencapaian target Zero Routine Flaring (ZRF) 2030 yang diatur dalam Peraturan Menteri ESDM Nomor 17 Tahun 2021 tentang Pelaksanaan Pengelolaan Gas Suar pada Kegiatan Usaha Minyak dan Gas Bumi untuk mengakhiri pembakaran gas flaring rutin (routine flaring) pada tahun 2030. Saat ini, Perusahaan X telah berupaya melakukan pengurangan emisi di proses produksi minyak mentah namun memiliki banyak tantangan terutama dalam mengejar target penurunan emisi CO2 sebesar 29% pada 2030 di mana akan berpengaruh kepada keberlangsungan operasional bisnis.
Pengendalian emisi gas rumah kaca perlu dilakukan pada sumber emisi yang memberikan dampak pencemaran udara terbesar pada proses produksi minyak mentah di Perusahaan X agar pengurangan emisi menjadi efektif. Dalam upaya tersebut, Perusahaan X perlu menggunakan pendekatan Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) dengan perangkat lunak SimaPro 9.5 yang dapat digunakan sebagai penentu besaran dampak pencemaran dan komponen kegiatan yang memberikan dampak terbesar (hotspot). Pada LCA akan menggunakan metode EDIP (Environmental Design of Industrial Products) 2003 digunakan untuk mengkuantifikasi dampak emisi pencemaran udara dalam kategori global warming, ozone depletion, ozone formation (human), dan human toxicity air pada ruang lingkup cradle to gate di proses produksi minyak mentah Perusahaan X. Stasiun Pengumpul 10 dengan kategori dampak global warming sebesar 9.18 kPt dan Penghasil dan Distribusi listrik dengan kategori dampak global warming sebesar 49 kPt di mana keduanya menjadi hotspot pada kajian ini. Proses selanjutnya adalah menentukan alternatif perbaikan yang paling efektif menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dengan perangkat lunak Expert Choice. Input untuk kriteria dan alternatif perbaikan pengendalian udara setiap hotspot terpilih dari lima responden akan dilakukan perbandingan berpasangan (pairwise comparison) menentukan alternatif perbaikan terbaik yaitu pemanfaatan gas flare menjadi listrik (gas to wire) dan pemasangan katalitik konverter pada turbin gas.
=================================================================================================================================
Company X is one of the entities operating in the oil and gas industry that is required to contribute to Indonesia’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This obligation aligns with the achievement of the Zero Routine Flaring (ZRF) 2030 target, as stipulated in the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Regulation No. 17 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Flare Gas Management in Oil and Gas Business Activities, which mandates the elimination of routine flaring by 2030. Currently, Company X has undertaken efforts to reduce emissions in its crude oil production processes. However, it faces significant challenges, particularly in meeting the 2030 target of a 29% reduction in CO₂ emissions, which is critical to the sustainability of its business operations. To ensure effective emission reduction, it is essential to control greenhouse gas emissions at the sources that contribute most significantly to air pollution within the crude oil production process. In this regard, Company X needs to adopt a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach using SimaPro 9.5 software, which can identify the magnitude of environmental impacts and pinpoint the most impactful activities (hotspots). The LCA will employ the EDIP (Environmental Design of Industrial Products) 2003 method to quantify air pollution impacts in the categories of global warming, ozone depletion, ozone formation (human), and human toxicity (air), within the cradle-to-gate scope of Company X’s crude oil production process. The results indicate that Gathering Station 10 contributes a global warming impact of 9.18 kPt, while electricity generation and distribution contributes 49 kPt, both of which are identified as key hotspots in this assessment. The next step involves determining the most effective improvement alternatives using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with Expert Choice software. Inputs for the criteria and improvement alternatives for each selected hotspot will be obtained from five respondents through pairwise comparisons to identify the optimal emission control strategy, namely the utilization of flare gas for electricity generation (gas to wire) and the installation of catalytic converters on gas turbines.
| Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | life cycle assessment, analytical hierarchy process, EDIP 2003, SimaPro, Expert Choice, pengendalian emisi proses produksi minyak, life cycle assessment, analytical hierarchy process, EDIP 2003, SimaPro, Expert Choice, emission control in crude oil production processes |
| Subjects: | T Technology > TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Civil, Planning, and Geo Engineering (CIVPLAN) > Environmental Engineering > 25101-(S2) Master Thesis |
| Depositing User: | Clairine Sola Gratia Hagins |
| Date Deposited: | 22 Jul 2025 07:25 |
| Last Modified: | 22 Jul 2025 07:25 |
| URI: | http://repository.its.ac.id/id/eprint/120535 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |