Analisis Percepatan Proyek Perkuatan Dermaga Terhadap Pengendalian Waktu (Studi Kasus Terminal Petikemas Di Jakarta)

Jodarwanto, Irawan (2025) Analisis Percepatan Proyek Perkuatan Dermaga Terhadap Pengendalian Waktu (Studi Kasus Terminal Petikemas Di Jakarta). Masters thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

Text 6032212118-Master_Thesis.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (13MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Kebaruan (novelty) dari penelitian ini adalah penggunaan kombinasi metode Fast Track dan Crashing dalam konteks proyek pelabuhan dengan pekerjaan struktur yang tipikal dengan skema Partial Hand Over (PHO) bertahap, yang belum banyak dibahas dalam literatur terdahulu. Pembahasan strategi untuk memenuhi kebutuhan proyek pelabuhan yang beroperasi 24 jam/7 hari dengan kompleksitas teknis tinggi. Proyek perkuatan dermaga di Terminal Petikemas XYZ dilakukan untuk mengakomodasi kapal kontainer hingga 100.000 DWT dan mendukung pengoperasian Quay Container Crane Super Post Panamax. Proyek ini dijadwalkan berlangsung selama 297 hari. Lokasi proyek berada di dermaga yang tetap beroperasi 24 jam. Pada pelaksanaan terjadi gangguan operasional, sehingga terjadi deviasi bobot prestasi sebesar -6,853% pada minggu ke-8, dan berpotensi terlambat. Penelitian untuk menganalisis percepatan proyek menggunakan metode Critical Path Method dengan membandingkan 2 (dua) metode yaitu Fast Track dan Crashing. Skenario penelitian mencakup kombinasi penambahan mesin bor, penambahan tenaga kerja (Crashing), dan penyesuaian tahap Partial Hand Over (Fast Track). Analisa metode Fast Track, PHO 2 (dua) tahap menghasilkan percepatan penyelesaian 296 hari atau 0,34% dan kenaikan total biaya proyek 0,10%, PHO 3 (tiga) tahap menghasilkan percepatan penyelesaian 295 hari atau 0,67% dan kenaikan total biaya proyek sebesar 0,21%, PHO 4 (empat) tahap
menghasilkan percepatan penyelesaian 295 hari atau 0,67%, dan kenaikan total biaya proyek sebesar 0,21%. Analisa metode Crashing, menghasilkan percepatan penyelesaian 285 hari atau 4,04%, dan kenaikan total biaya proyek sebesar 0,13%. Perbandingan antara kedua metode analisis yang dilakukan, maka berdasarkan matriks penilaian kuantatif, hasil PHO 4 (empat) tahap lebih baik bagi operasional karena areal yang dikerjakan tidak terlalu panjang, durasi penyelesaian proyek lebih cepat daripada durasi normal dan target Box Per Ship Per Hour (BSH) dapat tercapai dengan kenaikan biaya listrik paling kecil dibandingkan dengan skema yang lain. Hasil penelitian ini dapat menjadi referensi proyek infrastruktur pelabuhan masa depan.
=======================================================================================================================================
The novelty of this research is the use of a combination of Fast Track and Crashing methods in the context of a port project with typical structural work with phased Partial Hand Over (PHO) scheme, which has not been widely discussed in previous literature. Discussion of strategies to meet the needs of port projects that operate 24 hours/7 days with high technical complexity. The berthing reinforcement project at XYZ Container Terminal was carried out to accommodate container ships up to 100,000 DWT and support the operation of the Super Post Panamax Quay Container Crane. This project is scheduled to last for 297 days. The project location is at a berth that remains operational 24 hours. During the implementation, operational disruptions occurred, resulting in a deviation in the achievement weight of -6.853% in the 8th week, and the potential for delays. Research to analyze project acceleration using the Critical Path Method by comparing 2 (two) methods, namely Fast Track and Crashing. The research scenario includes a combination of adding drilling machines, adding labor (Crashing), and adjusting the Partial Hand Over stage (Fast Track). Fast Track method analysis, PHO 2 (two) stages resulted in an acceleration of completion of 296 days or 0.34% and an increase in total project costs of 0.10%, PHO 3 (three) stages resulted in an acceleration of completion of 295 days or 0.67% and an increase in total project costs of 0.21%, PHO 4 (four)
stages resulted in an acceleration of completion of 295 days or 0.67%, and an increase in total project costs of 0.21%. Crashing method analysis resulted in a completion acceleration of 285 days or 4.04%, and an increase in total project costs of 0.13%. A comparison between the two analysis methods carried out, then based on the quantitative assessment matrix, the results of the 4 (four) stage PHO are better for operations because the area being worked on is not too long, the project completion duration is faster than the normal duration and the Box Per Ship Per Hour (BSH) target can be achieved with the smallest increase in electricity costs compared to other schemes. The results of this study can be a reference for future port infrastructure projects.

Item Type:	Thesis (Masters)
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Crashing Project, Critical Path Method, Fast Track, Perkuatan Dermaga, Percepatan Proyek,Crashing Project, Critical Path Method, Fast Track, Berth Strengthening, Project acceleration.
Subjects:	T Technology > T Technology (General) > T56.8 Project Management
Divisions:	Interdisciplinary School of Management and Technology (SIMT) > 61101-Master of Technology Management (MMT)
Depositing User:	Irawan Jodarwanto
Date Deposited:	01 Aug 2025 07:01
Last Modified:	04 Aug 2025 03:10
URI:	http://repository.its.ac.id/id/eprint/124079

Actions (login required)

View Item