Comparative Analysis Of Environmentally Friendly Ship Fuels: Study On Sustainable Fuel Options For Ships

Steeven, Steeven (2025) Comparative Analysis Of Environmentally Friendly Ship Fuels: Study On Sustainable Fuel Options For Ships. Other thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

[thumbnail of 5018201062-Undergraduate_Thesis.pdf] Text
5018201062-Undergraduate_Thesis.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (2MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Industri pelayaran berperan signifikan dalam perdagangan global, namun menghadapi tantangan lingkungan akibat penggunaan bahan bakar kapal tradisional yang menyebabkan polusi dan emisi gas rumah kaca. Untuk mengatasi permasalahan ini, Organisasi Maritim Internasional (IMO) telah memberlakukan regulasi yang mewajibkan penggunaan bahan bakar rendah sulfur, yang mendorong adopsi Bahan Bakar Rendah Sulfur (Low-Sulfur Fuel Oil/LSFO), Solar Ultra Rendah Sulfur (Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel/ULSD), dan biodiesel sebagai alternatif. Opsi bahan bakar ini bertujuan untuk mengurangi emisi sulfur yang berbahaya bagi kesehatan dan lingkungan, serta menurunkan emisi gas rumah kaca. Studi ini mengevaluasi dan membandingkan kinerja lingkungan, kelayakan ekonomi, serta implikasi regulasi dari LSFO, ULSD, dan biodiesel melalui pendekatan metode campuran. Tinjauan literatur secara menyeluruh dilakukan terhadap artikel ilmiah, laporan industri, dan regulasi terkait, sementara analisis kuantitatif menilai emisi, efisiensi bahan bakar, konsumsi energi, dan biaya. Studi ini menyoroti kelebihan dan kekurangan masing-masing bahan bakar, serta memberikan wawasan mengenai kesesuaiannya untuk operasional maritim berkelanjutan. Setelah studi ini selesai, disimpulkan bahwa LSFO saat ini merupakan pengganti paling tepat untuk Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) di antara ketiga opsi tersebut. Penggunaan LSFO disarankan karena menghasilkan emisi yang minimal, sehingga membantu mengurangi pencemaran lingkungan. Selain itu, biaya yang terkait dengan penggunaan LSFO dan emisinya relatif lebih rendah dibandingkan dengan sumber energi berkelanjutan lainnya. Penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi praktis bagi para pemangku kepentingan untuk mendukung pengambilan keputusan menuju praktik pelayaran yang ramah lingkungan.
==========================================================================================================================================
Oil The shipping industry plays a crucial role in global trade and commerce, serving as a lifeline for the transportation of goods across continents. However, the environmental impact of traditional ship fuels has increasingly become a concern due to their contribution to air and water pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and climate change. In response to this pressing issue, there has been a growing interest in exploring and adopting environmentally friendly alternatives to conventional ship fuels. One of the primary concerns in the shipping industry is the reduction of sulfur emissions, which are harmful to both human health and the environment. To address this, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has implemented regulations mandating the use of low-sulfur fuels in maritime transport. As a result, Low-Sulfur Fuel Oil (LSFO) has emerged as a prominent option for reducing sulfur emissions in ships. Additionally, Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) has gained traction as an alternative fuel for ships, offering lower sulfur content compared to traditional marine diesel. Furthermore, biodiesel, has garnered attention as a sustainable alternative that can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Given the urgency of addressing environmental challenges in the shipping industry, conducting a comparative analysis of environmentally friendly ship fuels is imperative. This study aims to evaluate and compare the environmental performance, economic viability, and regulatory implications of LSFO, ULSD, and biodiesel in the context of sustainable fuel options for ships. Employing a mixed-methods approach, it integrates literature review and quantitative analysis. The literature review gathers insights from scholarly articles, industry reports, and governmental regulations, comprehensively examining environmental, economic, and regulatory aspects of the selected fuels. The comparative analysis encompasses qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Qualitatively, it compares the advantages and disadvantages of each fuel, assessing their environmental performance, economic viability, and regulatory implications. Quantitatively, emissions associated with LSFO, ULSD, and biodiesel are calculated based on available data and emission factors. Fuel efficiency, energy consumption metrics, and associated costs are evaluated. The study aims to quantify the environmental benefits, and economic implications of adopting different fuel options for ships. By integrating qualitative insights with quantitative analysis, this research offers valuable recommendations to stakeholders in the maritime industry, facilitating informed decisions toward sustainable and eco-friendly shipping practices.

Item Type: Thesis (Other)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Heavy Fuel Oil, LSFO, ULSD, Biodiesel
Subjects: V Naval Science > VM Naval architecture. Shipbuilding. Marine engineering > VM276.A1 Fuel (Including supplies, costs, etc.)
Divisions: Faculty of Marine Technology (MARTECH) > Naval Architecture and Shipbuilding Engineering > 36201-(S1) Undergraduate Thesis
Depositing User: Steeven .
Date Deposited: 05 Aug 2025 08:56
Last Modified: 05 Aug 2025 08:56
URI: http://repository.its.ac.id/id/eprint/127589

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item