Evaluasi Supplier Dengan Pendekatan Vendor Performance Indicator Dan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Studi Kasus Supporting Material- Outer Pack Di PT. "X" Surabaya)

Heman, Savliyas (2005) Evaluasi Supplier Dengan Pendekatan Vendor Performance Indicator Dan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Studi Kasus Supporting Material- Outer Pack Di PT. "X" Surabaya). Masters thesis, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

Text 9100201208-Master_thesis.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (37MB)

Abstract

PT. "X" Surabaya merupakan perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang manufaktur dan memproduksi rokok serta sangat memperhatikan pentingnya peranan supplier dalam rantai pasok bahan bakunya. Guna meningkatkan daya tawar dan menjamin kelangsungan produksi, perusahaan dituntut untuk memiliki lebih dari satu supplier untuk material tertentu, dengan kondisi setiap supplier yang berbeda satu sama lain. Evaluasi supplier dilakukan terhadap material outer pack (supporting material) sebagai upaya untuk menilai kinerja supplier berdasarkan kriteria penilaian yang telah ditentukan oleh perusahaan serta menentukan kebijakan manajemen dalam proses pembelian sesuai dengan proporsi yang tepat. Permasalahan muncul ketika PT. "X" dalam melakukan evaluasi supplier hanya terbatas pada perspektif cost, quality, dan delivery yang dinilai berdasarkan faktor subjektivitas, sementara beberapa kriteria lain belum terakomodasi sebagai bahan pertimbangan dan penilaian supplier. Identifikasi kriteria dilakukan berdasarkan Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) dengan kerangka dasar Quality, Cost, Delivery, Flexibility, dan Responsiveness (QCDFR). Rancangan sistem evaluasi supplier menghasilkan 17 VPI yang dianggap penting, yaitu enam VPI pada kriteria Quality, dua VPI pada kriteria Cost, tiga VPI pada kriteria Delivery, tiga VPI pada kriteria Flexibility, dan empat VPI pada kriteria Responsiveness. Proses pembobotan diperoleh melalui brainstorming dengan pihak manajemen menggunakan pendekatan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) yang diolah dengan perangkat lunak Expert Choice. Kriteria dengan bobot tertinggi adalah Quality. Hasil pengukuran menunjukkan bahwa kinerja supplier PT. Pura Barutama merupakan yang tertinggi, disusul oleh PT. Tunas Alvin dan PT. Semarang Packaging Indonesia. Berdasarkan analisis Traffic Light System, VPI yang terkait dengan Responsiveness perlu ditingkatkan pada ketiga supplier karena kinerjanya masih rendah. Hasil evaluasi supplier dapat digunakan oleh perusahaan sebagai bahan pertimbangan dalam menetapkan kebijakan kuota pengadaan material outer pack dari masing-masing supplier pada periode berikutnya.
=================================================================================================================================
PT. "X" Surabaya is a manufacturing company engaged in cigarette production and places considerable importance on the role of suppliers in its raw material supply chain. To increase its bargaining power and ensure production continuity, the company is required to have more than one supplier for certain materials, as the conditions of each supplier vary from one another. Supplier evaluation is conducted for outer pack materials (supporting materials) as an effort to assess supplier performance based on evaluation criteria established by the company and to determine management policies for the purchasing process according to appropriate proportions. The problem arises because PT. "X" currently evaluates suppliers only from the perspectives of cost, quality, and delivery, which are assessed subjectively, while several other criteria have not yet been accommodated as considerations in supplier assessment and evaluation. The criteria are identified based on the Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI) framework, which consists of Quality, Cost, Delivery, Flexibility, and Responsiveness (QCDFR). The supplier evaluation system design resulted in 17 important VPIs, consisting of six VPIs for Quality, two for Cost, three for Delivery, three for Flexibility, and four for Responsiveness. The weighting process was based on brainstorming with management and employed the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), processed using Expert Choice software. Quality received the highest weight. The measurement results showed that PT. Pura Barutama had the highest supplier performance, followed by PT. Tunas Alvin and PT. Semarang Packaging Indonesia, respectively. Based on the Traffic Light System analysis, the VPIs related to Responsiveness need to be improved for all three suppliers because their performance remains relatively low. The supplier evaluation results can be used by the company as a basis for establishing procurement quota policies for outer pack materials from each supplier in the subsequent period.

Item Type:	Thesis (Masters)
Additional Information:	RTMT 658.7 Her e 2005
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Evaluasi Supplier, Vendor Performance Indicator (VPJ), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Traffic Light System , Supplier evaluation, Vendor Performance Indicator (VPI), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Traffic Light System.
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD39.5 Industrial procurement.
Divisions:	Faculty of Business and Management Technology > Management Technology > 61101-(S2) Master Thesis
Depositing User:	magang .
Date Deposited:	15 Sep 2026 07:27
Last Modified:	15 Sep 2026 07:30
URI:	http://repository.its.ac.id/id/eprint/144508

Actions (login required)

View Item